Filed on July 25 by Rogers, the lawsuit alleges defamation, unfair business practices, malicious prosecution, and abuse of legal processes that have damaged the business of owner Emmanuel Manolakas. Rogers calls for a jury trial, unspecified punitive damages, trebled damages where allowed by state statute, attorney fees, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest of 8%.

In the aftermath of the Bella Vino trial, the City of Morganton, with the assistance of newly appointed attorney Daniel E. Peterson, is challenging the $705,000 verdict through various motions. The City, represented by Peterson and Andrew Santaniello, has filed motions seeking a new trial, judgment alteration, and relief, citing concerns over flawed jury instructions and speculative damages. The dispute centers around a breach of contract claim against owner Emmanuel Manolakas, with the City requesting a reduction in the award or a new trial to address perceived issues. The upcoming motion hearing on July 16 at the Burke County Courthouse will further examine the City's efforts to challenge the jury's decision and potentially mitigate post-judgment interest.

In a highly contested two-week trial between the City of Morganton and Bella Vino owner Emmanuel Manolakas, old wounds were exposed and questions arose regarding the omission of key facts and the future of the restaurant. The status of the Bella Vino lease remains uncertain, with discussions ongoing about operating on a month-to-month basis or renewing the lease until 2027. Despite Manolakas attempting renewal, the City claimed default due to late payments, sparking further debate. Additionally, the owner's previous convictions from 2004 in Ohio were not included in the trial, as deemed irrelevant under state law. The past legal troubles involving gross sexual imposition charges shed light on Manolakas' history and fueled community discussions throughout Morganton.